Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet leads with 13.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $17.97 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
6 months newer

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Claude 3 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra