+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 17.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.6M more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Sonnet. Llama 4 Maverick is $17.23 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($17.23 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:60.6%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:77.9%(+17.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:60.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:77.9%(+17.3%)
Providers:7