+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet leads with 8.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
4 months newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($17.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:84.0%(+8.3%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:75.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:84.0%(+8.3%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:75.8%
Providers:2