+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct leads with 11.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:58.5%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:70.2%(+11.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:58.5%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:70.2%(+11.8%)
Providers:0