Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet leads with 11.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is $17.80 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Mini was developed by Microsoft as a small language model designed to deliver impressive performance despite its compact size. Built with efficiency in mind, it demonstrates that capable language understanding and generation can be achieved with fewer parameters, making AI more accessible for edge and resource-constrained deployments.
5 months newer

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Azure