Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 368.0K more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $17.79 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
9 months newer

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29

Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi 4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi 4
Phi 4
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi 4

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi 4

Phi 4
DeepInfra