+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet leads with 1.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 263.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
6 months newer
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($17.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Average Score:65.0%(+1.9%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:63.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Sonnet
Avg Score:65.0%(+1.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:63.1%
Providers:1