Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 31.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Sonnet offers 268.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $16.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet was introduced as the balanced middle tier of the Claude 3 family, offering a combination of strong capabilities and operational speed. Designed to provide an optimal tradeoff between intelligence and performance for everyday tasks, it served as a versatile solution for a wide range of enterprise and consumer applications.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-02-29

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3 Sonnet

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3 Sonnet

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3 Sonnet

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Claude 3 Sonnet

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita