Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 12.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $13.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Launched on the same date

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock