Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 34.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $85.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
7 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Opus 4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Opus 4
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Opus 4
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Opus 4

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval