Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 40.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 136.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $13.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
11 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval