+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek-R1-0528
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 21.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $2.15 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15($2.15 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:49.1%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:70.2%(+21.1%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Coding40.6%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Coding44.6%(+4.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:49.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:70.2%(+21.1%)
Providers:3