Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B leads with 23.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is $4.30 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B was created through knowledge distillation from DeepSeek-R1 into a Llama-based architecture, designed to transfer reasoning capabilities to a widely-used open-source foundation. Built to combine DeepSeek's reasoning innovations with Llama's ecosystem compatibility, it enables broader access to advanced reasoning techniques.
3 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
DeepInfra