+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 17.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B was developed as a mid-sized distilled variant based on Qwen, designed to balance reasoning capability with practical deployment considerations. Built to provide strong analytical performance while remaining accessible, it serves applications requiring reliable reasoning without flagship-scale resources.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:41.6%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:59.1%(+17.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:41.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:59.1%(+17.5%)
Providers:0