Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads with 20.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $4.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
3 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra