Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 5.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 383.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $4.38 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
5 months newer

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V2.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V2.5
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V2.5
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V2.5

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V2.5

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Hyperbolic