+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek-V3 0324
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 0324 leads with 21.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 72.3K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3 0324. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is $3.38 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 0324 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3-0324 represents a specific release iteration of DeepSeek-V3, developed to incorporate ongoing improvements and refinements. Built to provide enhanced stability and performance based on deployment learnings, it continues the evolution of the DeepSeek-V3 architecture with iterative enhancements.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek
2025-03-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input:$0.28
Output:$1.14($3.38 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:53.3%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Average Score:74.8%(+21.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:53.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Avg Score:74.8%(+21.5%)
Providers:1