Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 25.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 72.3K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $3.53 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
2 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita