Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 28.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 170.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is $4.12 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
11 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Claude 3.5 Haiku

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Novita
ZeroEval