+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek VL2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 141.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $4804.70 cheaper per million tokens. DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
1 month newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00($4804.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1