Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 30.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $2.00 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
7 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval