Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 10.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B is $4.74 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
4 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemma 3 4B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemma 3 4B

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B
DeepInfra