Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 16.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 336.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $55.20 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
8 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together