+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 26.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
9 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:44.2%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:70.5%(+26.3%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Coding40.6%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Coding57.6%(+17.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:44.2%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:70.5%(+26.3%)
Providers:0