Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 19.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 379.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. GPT-3.5 Turbo is $2.80 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
1 year newer

GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-3.5 Turbo

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI