Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 13.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 334.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $85.20 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
1 year newer

GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4

GPT-4
Azure
OpenAI