Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 9.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 680.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. GPT-4.1 nano is $4.30 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
5 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4.1 nano
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4.1 nano
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4.1 nano

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4.1 nano

GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI