Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 12.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 255.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $7.70 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
2 months newer

GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4o
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4o
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4o
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4o

Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-4o

GPT-4o
Azure
OpenAI