+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT OSS 120B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 27.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $4.26 cheaper per million tokens. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
9 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.45($4.26 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:46.3%
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:74.0%(+27.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:46.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:74.0%(+27.7%)
Providers:5