+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Granite 3.3 8B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 22.7% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:85.6%(+22.7%)
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:62.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:85.6%(+22.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:62.9%
Providers:0