+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 11.1% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the Granite base model, designed to follow instructions reliably in enterprise settings. Built to serve business applications requiring dependable language understanding, it provides IBM's accessible interface for enterprise AI.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:85.6%(+11.1%)
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:74.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:85.6%(+11.1%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:74.5%
Providers:0