+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 19.4% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 124.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Kimi K2 0905 is $1.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
10 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50($1.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:66.0%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:85.5%(+19.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:66.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:85.5%(+19.4%)
Providers:2