Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 21.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 Instruct. Kimi K2 Instruct is $1.93 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
8 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Kimi K2 Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Kimi K2 Instruct
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Kimi K2 Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Kimi K2 Instruct

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Kimi K2 Instruct

Kimi K2 Instruct
Novita