Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 2.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $4.40 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
3 months newer

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together