Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 14.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is $4.70 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
27 days newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Together