Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 1.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $4.05 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
27 days newer

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together