Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $4.40 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
1 month newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together