+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 25.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:41.6%
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:66.7%(+25.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:41.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:66.7%(+25.1%)
Providers:0