Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 6.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is $4.40 cheaper per million tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
4 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI