+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Nova Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 98.0K more tokens in context window than Nova Lite. Nova Lite is $4.50 cheaper per million tokens. Nova Lite supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
29 days newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24($4.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:70.5%(+0.3%)
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:70.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:70.5%(+0.3%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:70.2%
Providers:1