+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Nova Pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Pro leads with 3.9% higher average benchmark score. Nova Pro offers 200.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Nova Pro is $0.80 cheaper per million tokens. Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Pro was developed as the flagship model in the Nova family, designed to provide advanced multimodal understanding across text, images, and other modalities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Amazon's most capable offering for enterprise applications.
29 days newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Nova Pro
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Input:$0.80
Output:$3.20($0.80 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:70.5%
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Average Score:74.5%(+3.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:70.5%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Avg Score:74.5%(+3.9%)
Providers:1