+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 100.0K more tokens in context window than o1. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $70.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
1 month newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00($70.20 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:57.0%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:73.4%(+16.4%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Coding40.6%
+
+
+
+
o1
Coding41.0%(+0.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:57.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:73.4%(+16.4%)
Providers:2