Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 35.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 100.0K more tokens in context window than o3. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $5.20 cheaper per million tokens. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
5 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

o3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

o3
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Haiku

o3
o3
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

o3

Claude 3.5 Haiku

o3

o3
OpenAI