Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 22.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is $4.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Mini was developed by Microsoft as a small language model designed to deliver impressive performance despite its compact size. Built with efficiency in mind, it demonstrates that capable language understanding and generation can be achieved with fewer parameters, making AI more accessible for edge and resource-constrained deployments.
2 months newer

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Azure