+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 18.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 263.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $4.50 cheaper per million tokens. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
1 month newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($4.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:78.8%(+18.7%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:60.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:78.8%(+18.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:60.1%
Providers:1