+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads with 6.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 260.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is $4.05 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($4.05 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:66.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Average Score:72.4%(+6.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:66.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Avg Score:72.4%(+6.4%)
Providers:4