+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 2.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 260.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is $4.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30($4.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:66.0%(+2.8%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:63.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:66.0%(+2.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:63.3%
Providers:1