+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 9.0% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:66.0%(+9.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:57.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:66.0%(+9.0%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:57.0%
Providers:0