Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 24.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 268.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $3.15 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku was developed as the next generation of Anthropic's fastest model, offering similar speed to Claude 3 Haiku while surpassing Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence benchmarks. Built with low latency, improved instruction following, and accurate tool use, it serves user-facing products, specialized sub-agent tasks, and data-heavy applications.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
10 months newer

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita