Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 15.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 168.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $72.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
9 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval